More from the 55-200 VR
I'm really digging this lens! No, the slow-shutter-speed telephoto shots aren't totally sharp, but for on-screen viewing, they're "acceptible." Consider that it was so dark that I had to use the little LED "flash" on my cell phone camera as a flashlight to walk through the woods to get this image, well after the sun had set on the horizon:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67e17/67e172dd314c339a140cbe006994f6b009a5cf99" alt=""
1/8th @ 200mm ISO 800, a little sharpening and NeatImage.
It's not perfect, of course, but considering I was shooting in near-total darkness, literally catching the last light hitting this mountain, I think it's pretty cool that I was able to catch something hand-held...
Here are a few more images, some with VR needed, and some without:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d448/4d4486f5073c21347f25f1e376f85ba66927048d" alt=""
1/90th @ 200mm ISO 200
Mmm. Huckleberry. Some of the softness is probably because I was a little too close. I actually wanted to slap the macro on, but since we were too busy picking huckleberries, I decided to leave the 55-200 VR on and step back beyond the 3-feet minimum. Here's where the 18-200 VR would've shined a little more, since its minimum focusing distance is only .5 m (compared with the 1.1m of the 55-200 VR). Again, pay a lot more, get a bit more...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e2ec/7e2ec3157aee5d55cc134ccaece783ed6444996f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2852a/2852a1b7f947e29ec77fbb5c23f9ab1a2e99e238" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc1cb/fc1cb0057a028f8d5d91f9c67d39b09b3b267952" alt=""
The clarity of this lens, even when VR may not be needed, is still pretty amazing.
I can tell that the images I'm going to get in the 55-200mm focal length will be much better than what I've gotten out of my other lenses in that focal length. Nikon has produced yet another low-budget beauty (to accompany the 50mm f/1.8 AF).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67e17/67e172dd314c339a140cbe006994f6b009a5cf99" alt=""
1/8th @ 200mm ISO 800, a little sharpening and NeatImage.
It's not perfect, of course, but considering I was shooting in near-total darkness, literally catching the last light hitting this mountain, I think it's pretty cool that I was able to catch something hand-held...
Here are a few more images, some with VR needed, and some without:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d448/4d4486f5073c21347f25f1e376f85ba66927048d" alt=""
1/90th @ 200mm ISO 200
Mmm. Huckleberry. Some of the softness is probably because I was a little too close. I actually wanted to slap the macro on, but since we were too busy picking huckleberries, I decided to leave the 55-200 VR on and step back beyond the 3-feet minimum. Here's where the 18-200 VR would've shined a little more, since its minimum focusing distance is only .5 m (compared with the 1.1m of the 55-200 VR). Again, pay a lot more, get a bit more...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e2ec/7e2ec3157aee5d55cc134ccaece783ed6444996f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2852a/2852a1b7f947e29ec77fbb5c23f9ab1a2e99e238" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc1cb/fc1cb0057a028f8d5d91f9c67d39b09b3b267952" alt=""
The clarity of this lens, even when VR may not be needed, is still pretty amazing.
I can tell that the images I'm going to get in the 55-200mm focal length will be much better than what I've gotten out of my other lenses in that focal length. Nikon has produced yet another low-budget beauty (to accompany the 50mm f/1.8 AF).
Labels: D2H, lens testing, Nikkor 55-200 AF-S VR, Nikon lenses
If you'd like to use images in this blog post, please e-mail paul(at)paulmphotography.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home