100mm F/2.8 Series E vs. 105mm F/2.5 AI
My friend at work loaned me his old camera gear to play with. Included in the kit was the 105mm f/2.5 AI lens. Since this lens has a pretty solid reputation for quality, I wanted to see how it compared to my $55 100mm f/2.8 Series E lens -- one of my favorite lenses.
VS data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8187/e8187b88d5f74c7b62d56949fa03745b6669e536" alt=""
All photos with the 105mm AIS were shot at f/2.8. Photos are exactly as they came out of the camera, with only the text added in Photoshop -- no further adjustment. I focused on the same item in both sets of pictures, using the same focus point on my D200. Let's look at the results:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caf1f/caf1fd0f2511051d6f372ff8d8f93f887ce4623f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49864/498643262f87a0fa7b2404fe5fe51bdd59cbb863" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf995/bf99575b42ff38883ecdf10a5ebffefc553284e9" alt=""
These lenses are practically the same. I notice very, very little difference. In the last set of photos, I do like the 105's bokeh a tad better -- it's a little creamier. Honestly, it makes me that much happier with my cheap 100mm holds its own.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f11e9/f11e9cc5309d632bc8a40c3019e56650b78c82b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8187/e8187b88d5f74c7b62d56949fa03745b6669e536" alt=""
All photos with the 105mm AIS were shot at f/2.8. Photos are exactly as they came out of the camera, with only the text added in Photoshop -- no further adjustment. I focused on the same item in both sets of pictures, using the same focus point on my D200. Let's look at the results:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb446/cb446e84872537649b94c8068b8165db347fcbb7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caf1f/caf1fd0f2511051d6f372ff8d8f93f887ce4623f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60d87/60d87d781a22a8297c368847e06fbe52680cbafe" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49864/498643262f87a0fa7b2404fe5fe51bdd59cbb863" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f392/9f3920aec741e94eac4d1bc94170d961cb433314" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf995/bf99575b42ff38883ecdf10a5ebffefc553284e9" alt=""
These lenses are practically the same. I notice very, very little difference. In the last set of photos, I do like the 105's bokeh a tad better -- it's a little creamier. Honestly, it makes me that much happier with my cheap 100mm holds its own.
Labels: 100mm shootout, borrowed lens, lens testing
If you'd like to use images in this blog post, please e-mail paul(at)paulmphotography.com
1 Comments:
That 100mm f/2.8 E is way sharper!
Post a Comment
<< Home